
China’s Hangzhou Court claimed that NFTs carry characteristics of property rights like value, scarcity, disposability, and readability, and therefore should be protected by the law.
The Hangzhou Internet Court is a court of special jurisdiction that focuses on internet-related cases. The Court dealt with a case in late November in which it called for NFT regulations.
The Hangzhou Digital Technology Company, which runs an NFT marketplace and a platform user, was on each side of the hearing.
The user claimed it didn’t receive the NFT it purchased, even after fulfilling all the requirements. The user claimed the company refunded them instead of delivering the purchased NFT.
Read more: China’s NFT Market Regulations Are Taking Off
The user claimed that the company caused him financial harm by withholding from their end of the bargain and sued to ask to either deliver the NFT or compensate for his financial loss by paying 99,999 yuan ($14,368).
In response, the company argued that they didn’t facilitate the transfer because the information the user provided during the purchase didn’t match.
Hangzhou Internet Court sided with the user because the transaction involved NFT digital collections, not NFT rights certificates. The court stated:
“NFT digital collections have the object characteristics of property rights such as value, scarcity, disposability, and tradability. They also have the unique properties of network virtual property such as network virtuality and technology, and are network virtual property. The contract involved does not violate the laws and regulations of our country, nor does it violate our country’s realistic policy and regulatory orientation to prevent economic and financial risks, and should be protected by our laws.”
Featured News
Confusion Reigns In AI Policy In US and Europe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
EU Clears ADNOC’s $16.3 Billion Acquisition of Covestro
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Spanish Antitrust Chief Says BBVA-Sabadell Merger Won’t Stifle Competition
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
German Road Repair Firms Fined for Collusion and Bid Rigging
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Visa and Mastercard Beat Cardholders’ Renewed Antitrust Claims Over Swipe Fees
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece