
Top independent oil producer ConocoPhillips announced on Friday that it has received a second request for information from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding its proposed acquisition of Marathon Oil. This request, which was also sent to Marathon Oil, was received on July 11 and marks a crucial step in the regulatory review process, potentially impacting the timeline of the merger.
The proposed acquisition, first announced in May, has been touted by ConocoPhillips as a strategic move that will be “immediately accretive” to its earnings and cash flow. The company projects that the merger will generate “at least $500 million of run rate cost and capital savings within the first full year following the closing of the transaction.” Despite these optimistic projections, the additional scrutiny from the FTC introduces a new layer of uncertainty.
The second request for information effectively delays the earliest possible date for the merger. Under FTC regulations, the companies must comply with the inquiry before they can proceed, pushing back the potential closing date to at least 30 days after both parties have fulfilled the FTC’s requirements. Initially, ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil had anticipated completing the deal in the fourth quarter of 2024.
As part of the acquisition terms, Marathon Oil shareholders will receive 0.255 shares of ConocoPhillips stock for each share of Marathon they own. This exchange represents a premium of nearly 15% to Marathon’s closing price of $26.45 before the deal was announced, highlighting the attractiveness of the offer to Marathon shareholders.
While ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil continue to cooperate with the FTC to expedite the review process, the outcome remains uncertain. The additional regulatory scrutiny reflects the significant impact the merger would have on the competitive landscape of the U.S. oil industry, necessitating a thorough evaluation to ensure compliance with antitrust laws and to safeguard market competition.
Industry analysts will be closely watching the developments in this case, as the successful completion of the acquisition could reshape the sector, bolstering ConocoPhillips’ position as a leading player in the market.
Featured News
Japan’s Prime Minister Criticizes US Block on Nippon Steel-US Steel Deal
Feb 17, 2025 by
CPI
UAE Cabinet Announces New Merger Control Filing Thresholds Effective March 2025
Feb 17, 2025 by
CPI
UK Regulator Warns Topps Tiles Acquisition Could Hurt Competition
Feb 17, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson Backs Trump’s Authority to Remove Commissioners
Feb 17, 2025 by
CPI
South Korea Suspends Downloads of Chinese AI App DeepSeek Over Data Privacy Concerns
Feb 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon