DOJ Suit Centers On Ticketmaster’s SafeTix, Alleging Anti-Competitive Market Control
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has criticized Ticketmaster’s SafeTix system, which the company markets as a secure method for accessing event tickets. The DOJ argues that the system’s real intent is to suppress competition, solidify Ticketmaster’s market dominance, and enhance its data collection capabilities.
According to Ticket News, the DOJ’s amended complaint, filed last week, describes SafeTix as a strategic maneuver to entrench Ticketmaster’s position in the ticketing industry. The lawsuit, now supported by ten additional states, contends that SafeTix undermines rival ticketing services by complicating ticket transfers and driving consumers to stick exclusively with Ticketmaster’s platform.
SafeTix, introduced over five years ago as part of Ticketmaster’s “Presence” suite, employs a dynamic barcode system. This technology ties tickets to the Ticketmaster app or the specific event venue, making them difficult to transfer outside of the platform. The system’s ever-changing barcodes, which cannot be captured in screenshots, aim to limit the effectiveness of secondary ticketing platforms and discourage fans from using alternative services.
The DOJ’s complaint highlights that SafeTix’s design not only consolidates Ticketmaster’s market position but also hinders competitors by complicating ticket resales. This strategy forces users to create Ticketmaster accounts for transactions, making it challenging for other services to offer a smooth resale experience and thereby discouraging new market entrants.
Ticket News further reports that internal documents from Ticketmaster reveal the company’s strategic intent behind SafeTix. A 2014 meeting document described the “non-transferable digital ticket” as a potential “game-changer,” while a 2017 document labeled the rotating barcode as a “product enhancement” aimed at increasing market share.
Another critical aspect of SafeTix, as detailed in the complaints, is its role in expanding Ticketmaster’s consumer data repository. The system provides Ticketmaster with comprehensive information not only about the ticket purchaser but also about individuals who receive transferred tickets. This extensive data collection capability offers Ticketmaster a significant competitive edge, enabling more targeted marketing and sales strategies.
A notable excerpt from the amended complaint cites Live Nation’s CEO, who purportedly stated that SafeTix allows the company to identify not only the original ticket buyer but also their accompanying guests, thereby providing unprecedented consumer insights.
The industry has long been aware of the implications of SafeTix, though consumer advocates face strong resistance from Live Nation’s substantial lobbying efforts. The ongoing legal dispute continues to spotlight the complexities and competitive dynamics within the ticketing industry.
Source: Ticket News
Featured News
Google Knew Publishers Would Resist Ad Sales Changes, According to Internal Documents in Antitrust Trial
Sep 13, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Antitrust Trial Explores Potential Impact of Tapestry-Capri Merger
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Australia Targets Big Tech with New Fines for Misinformation
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Mastercard to Acquire Cybersecurity Firm Recorded Future for $2.65 Billion
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Prime Minister: Apple’s €13 Billion Payment Could Fund Housing and Capital Projects
Sep 12, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández