A PYMNTS Company

FTC Greenlights Omnicom-Interpublic Merger with Political Ad Placement Restrictions

By  |  June 24, 2025

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has given the green light to the proposed merger between advertising giants Omnicom and Interpublic. However, the approval comes with a notable stipulation: the newly formed entity must not collaborate on ad placements that are influenced by political content.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    According to Reuters, this unusual regulatory condition serves as a behavioral remedy—a strategic alternative to the more common structural solutions like divestitures. The FTC’s approach signals a shift in how the agency is tackling perceived risks in the advertising industry, particularly around the influence of corporate media buying on political discourse.

    Rather than forcing the combined firm to shed assets, the FTC opted for a measure that directly targets conduct. As per Reuters, the agency’s concern centers on the potential misuse of market power to marginalize media outlets based on their ideological leanings. The condition effectively bars the merged company from coordinating ad strategies that discriminate against media platforms due to their political affiliations.

    Related: FTC Considers Political Content Clause in Omnicom-Interpublic Merger Review

    FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson highlighted the rationale in a statement, warning of “deliberate, coordinated efforts to steer ad revenue away from certain news organizations, media outlets and social media networks.” He emphasized the danger of large corporations being co-opted into broader ideological campaigns through opaque ad placement decisions.

    This move reflects mounting scrutiny over how advertising dollars are allocated—especially as debates intensify over who defines “brand safety” and whether agencies are overstepping by embedding political considerations into what are ostensibly commercial decisions. It’s also a cautionary signal to the broader marketing sector: regulatory tolerance for behind-the-scenes coordination that influences political expression is wearing thin.

    The FTC’s intervention underscores a growing willingness to act not only on structural competition concerns but also on subtler forms of influence that can shape public discourse.

    Source: Reuters