By Thomas Hoppner (Technical University Wildau)
On 27 July 2017, the European Commission adopted a decision finding that, between January 2008 and 27 July 2017, Google infringed Article 102 TFEU by positioning and displaying more favorably, its own comparison shopping service (compared to competing comparison shopping services) in the general search results pages of its search service “Google Search”.
This study assesses whether the measures taken by Google since the Decision conform with the obligations imposed by the Decision’s operative part. The study is based upon empirical data (for example, data covering consumer traffic, conversions, revenues and customer reactions) provided by 25 European comparison shopping services operating in 21 European markets , including the market leaders in 7 of the 13 commercially most relevant countries . Such services have combined their data for a representative economic and legal market analysis of the implications of Google’s chosen compliance mechanism.
Following an executive summary, as well as a summary in 13 illustrations with corresponding explanations, the main analysis will first outline the core elements of the Decision (Chapter 1) before explaining the measures that Google implemented to remedy the abuse (Chapter 2). The central assessment then follows in Chapter 3, examining the economic impact of Google’s chosen compliance mechanism and in Chapter 4, examining the mechanism’s compliance with the Decision. Chapter 5 outlines the consequences of the findings for Google and the Commission.
Featured News
Clifford Chance Expands Global Antitrust Team with New Partner
Dec 6, 2024 by
CPI
Spain’s Financial Regulator Awaits Antitrust Decision on BBVA’s Hostile Bid for Sabadell
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
RealPage Seeks Dismissal of DOJ Antitrust Suit, Citing Legal Flaws
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
EU Competition Chief Signals Potential Google Breakup Amid Big Tech Scrutiny
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Turkey Closes Antitrust Probe into Meta’s Threads-Instagram Practices
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead