
Japan is contemplating the regulation of large domestic and international artificial intelligence (AI) developers. According to Nikkei ,this move aims to curtail potential risks to society, including the dissemination of misinformation and involvement in criminal activities. The decision follows in the footsteps of the United States and the European Union, which have already implemented similar measures.
Historically, Japan has relied on a system of self-regulation by companies, guided by government-issued AI guidelines, to foster growth in the sector. However, concerns over the misuse of AI technologies have prompted the government’s AI strategy council to initiate discussions on the development of a legal framework. These discussions, slated to commence in May, will explore the feasibility and implications of imposing regulations on AI development.
While acknowledging the potential benefits of AI, authorities remain wary of its misuse. Of particular concern is the use of generative AI in spreading misinformation and facilitating criminal activities.
The upcoming deliberations will evaluate the pros and cons of implementing laws and regulations governing AI development, drawing insights from regulatory frameworks established in the United States and Europe. Central to these discussions is a draft proposal presented by Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in February.
The LDP’s proposal primarily targets large-scale AI developers, including entities like OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT. Key provisions of the plan include mandatory third-party verification of safety protocols for high-risk AI development and the compulsory sharing of risk-related information with the government. Additionally, developers would be required to submit regular compliance reports, with penalties imposed for violations.
However, the LDP has yet to reach a consensus on the definition of “large scale” developers or whether such designations should be unilaterally determined. The proposal also leaves certain details to be hashed out by the private sector, underscoring the delicate balance between regulation and fostering competitiveness.
Read more: Meta & OpenAI CEOs Back EU AI Regulations
The envisaged regulations are slated to be incorporated into the government’s overarching economic and reform policies, set to be formulated in June. Subsequently, a bill outlining the regulatory framework is expected to be introduced during the regular session of the Diet in 2025.
Nevertheless, some within the government remain cautious about deviating from the current policy of self-regulation by companies. Companies like Google have voiced concerns that excessive regulatory measures could stifle innovation and hinder the adoption of generative AI technologies.
Internationally, the European Union has emerged as a frontrunner in AI regulation, having passed comprehensive legislation in March mandating monitoring and transparency measures based on risk assessments, with penalties for non-compliance. In the United States, similar initiatives were introduced in 2023 through executive orders, mandating safety evaluations for select AI developers. Meanwhile, China has implemented stringent measures, including bans on the development of generative AI perceived as threatening national security.
Source: Asia Nikkei
Featured News
Qualcomm Challenges Arm’s Market Power in Antitrust Complaints Worldwide
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Partially Dismisses Investor Suit Against Google Over Ad Practices
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
UK Watchdog Scrutinizes Ticketmaster’s Dynamic Pricing Amid Oasis Ticket Controversy
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Democratic Senators Urge White House to Seek Congressional Approval for TikTok Deadline Extension
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Spain’s Antitrust Authority Probes Generali and Sanitas Over Competition Concerns
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mobile Ecosystems
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Mobile Ecosystems: An Intellectual Entelechy but A Necessary Model
Mar 24, 2025 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
Creating Contestability and Fairness in Mobile Ecosystems: The Contribution of the DMA
Mar 24, 2025 by
Damien Geradin & Daniel Mandrescu
Digital Ecosystems and the Not (Yet) As Efficient Competitor Principle
Mar 24, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Assessing the Competition Law Scrutiny of Smart Wearables and Mobile AR/VR Devices
Mar 24, 2025 by
Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli