A PYMNTS Company

Pork Producers Seek Immediate Appeal in Price-Fixing Case

By  |  June 15, 2025

A group of top pork producers is urging a federal appellate court to fast-track an appeal in a sweeping antitrust case that threatens to reshape long-standing business practices in the meat industry. The companies are pushing to overturn a recent court ruling that allowed price-fixing allegations against them to proceed, citing the potential for costly, repetitive litigation across multiple jurisdictions.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The request marks a departure from the typical legal process, where parties usually wait until a case concludes before seeking appellate review. But in this instance, pork producers argue that immediate intervention by a higher court is necessary to avoid what they describe as a prolonged and inefficient legal quagmire. Per a statement from the companies involved, resolving the core legal questions now could help streamline proceedings and prevent conflicting judgments in related lawsuits filed nationwide.

    At the center of the controversy is the industry’s use of Agri Stats, a third-party service that aggregates and shares production and sales data among competing firms. According to a recent district court decision, the plaintiffs—ranging from food retailers to consumer groups—presented sufficient evidence that this data-sharing may have enabled pork companies to coordinate pricing and output, resulting in inflated prices across the market.

    Related: DOJ Opposes Motion to Disqualify Judge in Pork Price-Fixing Case

    The judge’s ruling emphasized that most major pork processors subscribed to Agri Stats during the alleged conspiracy period. One notable exception—a company that largely abstained from participating—was subsequently dismissed from the case, reinforcing the court’s view that the data-sharing platform played a central role in the alleged collusion. According to the same decision, the combination of detailed benchmarking reports and uniform market behavior among participants could suggest coordinated action worthy of a jury’s scrutiny.

    In their appeal request, the pork companies maintain that the use of benchmarking tools like Agri Stats is a routine and legitimate business practice. They argue that the ruling, if left unchallenged, could have sweeping implications not just for the pork sector but for any industry that relies on shared performance metrics for strategic planning.

    Per a statement from the defendants, there is a growing split among federal courts over how to interpret participation in data-sharing platforms in the context of antitrust law. In one precedent from another segment of the meat industry, a judge found that benchmarking alone does not constitute evidence of conspiracy, reasoning that many companies use such tools to remain competitive and efficient.

    Source: Swine Web