
Public interest organizations have urged the full 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider a recent ruling that determined the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lacks the legal authority to reinstate net neutrality regulations, according to Reuters. The request comes after a three-judge panel blocked the FCC’s efforts to restore the landmark open internet rules first introduced in 2015 and later rescinded during the Trump administration.
The appeal, filed on Tuesday, was brought forth by advocacy groups including Free Press, Public Knowledge, the Open Technology Institute, and the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. These groups argue that the ruling contradicts an earlier decision by another court, highlighting what they believe to be a legal inconsistency in how net neutrality policies are adjudicated, per Reuters.
Net neutrality regulations, initially established under the Obama administration, were designed to prevent internet service providers from blocking or throttling content and from engaging in paid prioritization. However, the FCC reversed these rules in 2017 under the leadership of then-Chairman Ajit Pai, appointed by former President Donald Trump. Since then, efforts to reinstate the regulations have faced legal and political hurdles.
Related: Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
The Biden administration had sought to restore net neutrality protections, emphasizing their importance for maintaining a fair and open internet. However, the recent decision by the three-judge panel has raised concerns among public interest groups that the FCC’s authority to enforce such regulations remains in question.
According to Reuters, the groups’ request for a rehearing underscores their belief that the appeals court’s ruling misinterpreted existing legal precedent. They maintain that the FCC should have the authority to regulate broadband services to ensure an equitable internet landscape.
As the full 6th Circuit Court considers whether to take up the case, the outcome could have significant implications for future attempts to reestablish net neutrality protections.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li