San Francisco has made headlines this week with a groundbreaking decision by the Board of Supervisors to implement a ban on algorithmic price setting within the rental housing market. This ordinance, which passed with notable support, targets real estate management software from major players such as RealPage and Yardi, which have been scrutinized for their role in inflating rental costs, according to The Register.
The measure, introduced on July 16, 2024, by Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin, aims to curb what he describes as “price collusion among large corporate landlords,” a practice that critics argue leads to rent-gouging. In a statement, Peskin emphasized that eliminating automated price-setting tools would help create a more competitive market, potentially lowering rents in San Francisco. Notably, Peskin has previously supported down-zoning measures that restrict real estate availability, which have been linked to rising costs.
While the ban addresses one aspect of the complex rental market, it is not a cure-all. The Register points out that other factors, including private equity investments, rising housing and construction costs, also play significant roles in shaping rental prices. The ordinance, seen as the first of its kind in the U.S., is pending final approval by the Board of Supervisors, with a decisive vote scheduled for September 3, 2024.
Lee Hepner, senior legal counsel at the American Economic Liberties Project, praised the ordinance as a forward-thinking initiative to ensure fairer housing markets. Hepner criticized RealPage’s rent-setting software for enabling corporate landlords to exploit rental markets while constraining housing supply across the nation. Per The Register, the ordinance specifically prohibits the sale, licensing, or use of any algorithmic device that determines or advises on rental prices or occupancy rates for residential units in San Francisco.
According to The Register, the ordinance defines an “algorithmic device” as any system utilizing algorithms to analyze nonpublic data on competitor rents or occupancy levels. These devices are designed to guide landlords on decisions such as whether to keep units vacant or set specific rental rates.
Source: The Register
Featured News
FTC Takes On Prescription Drug Middlemen Over High Insulin Costs
Sep 20, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Incoming Competition Head Pushes for Policy Shift to Support ‘European Champions
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Challenges $217 Million Legal Fee Demand in Privacy Case
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
EU Moves to Enforce Apple’s Compliance with New Market Rules
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
California Attorney General Bonta Stands Firm Against Albertsons-Kroger Merger
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández