The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) is extending the scope of its anti-money laundering (AML) ordinance to cover cryptocurrency assets.
The adjusted regulations, which will come into effect Jan. 1, 2023, mean that customers will have to prove their identity if they make transactions that total 1,000 Swiss francs (about $1,003) or more during a one-month period when they trade crypto for cash or another anonymous form of money, FINMA said in a Wednesday (Nov. 2) press release.
The amendments are the result of a consultation during which the regulator assessed how best to interpret and enforce new AML laws, the release stated.
Related: EU Agrees On Strong AML Rules For Crypto Transactions
While some in the Swiss crypto industry argued that the 1,000-franc threshold would create unnecessary roadblocks to legitimate crypto transactions and should be raised to as much as 25,000 Swiss francs (about $25,008), according to a CoinDesk report, FINMA ultimately rebuffed requests for a higher limit for unverified transactions.
In recent times, Switzerland has sought to establish itself as a crypto hub, and the country is home to several regulated crypto banks that serve some of the world’s largest digital asset platforms.
“Traditionally, Swiss banks are considered among the most secure in the world with a high level of protection against fraud, making the Alpine nation a top destination for businesses and individuals looking to keep their wealth safe,” PYMNTS wrote last month.
However, in the past, money launderers have tried to take advantage of Switzerland’s banking secrecy laws, and regulators have been at pains to disassociate the Swiss financial services sector from criminal funds and dark money, CoinDesk reported.
For example, the government recently proposed a registry of company ownership that will make it harder to hide the true ownership of assets through shell companies.
Featured News
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Realtors’ Appeal, DOJ Antitrust Probe Moves Forward
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Commerzbank Chairman Doubts Amicable Merger with UniCredit After Stake Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senator Warren Presses HUD Nominee on Rent Price-Fixing
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Epic Games CEO Accuses Tech Giants of Shifting Loyalties to Court Trump Administration
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Apple’s New Developer Fees Face Renewed Scrutiny from EU Antitrust Regulators
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand