On Monday, a U.S. appeals court subjected TikTok and its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to rigorous questioning as part of their ongoing legal battle to block a law that could lead to a nationwide ban on the popular video app. The case, which could impact 170 million American TikTok users, is being closely watched ahead of a looming January 19 deadline that may force ByteDance to divest its U.S. operations.
According to Reuters, the three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia began reviewing arguments brought forward by TikTok and ByteDance in May, as the companies seek an injunction to prevent the law from taking effect. The panel, consisting of Judges Sri Srinivasan, Neomi Rao, and Douglas Ginsburg, expressed skepticism during their exchanges with TikTok’s lawyer, Andrew Pincus.
Pincus argued that the U.S. government has failed to provide compelling evidence that TikTok poses a national security risk, and that the law undermines several constitutional protections, including First Amendment free speech rights. “The law before this court is unprecedented, and its effect would be staggering,” Pincus emphasized, claiming it would be the first instance where Congress targets a specific U.S.-based platform, effectively silencing millions of Americans.
Per Reuters, the law in question, which was signed by President Joe Biden in April, requires ByteDance to either sell or divest TikTok’s U.S. assets by January 19. If the company fails to comply, TikTok could be banned from app stores such as those operated by Apple and Google, and barred from using internet hosting services in the U.S. The legislation was driven by mounting concerns among U.S. lawmakers that Chinese authorities might exploit TikTok to access sensitive American data or engage in surveillance.
Read more: TikTok Urges US Appeals Court to Overturn Law Mandating Sale of US Assets
The law allows for a possible three-month extension of the deadline if the U.S. president certifies that ByteDance is making substantial progress toward divestiture. However, ByteDance has argued that such a move is “not possible technologically, commercially, or legally.”
This legal battle comes as the U.S. presidential campaign enters its final stages, with prominent figures like Republican candidate Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris using TikTok to engage with younger voters. Trump’s stance on TikTok has shifted since his previous efforts to ban the app in 2020; the former president has stated that if re-elected in November, he would ensure the platform is not banned.
The Justice Department has maintained that TikTok’s ties to China present a critical national security threat, citing the potential for Chinese interference in American media and data. They argue that TikTok’s ownership structure gives the Chinese government access to vast amounts of personal data and the ability to manipulate the flow of information within the U.S. However, ByteDance and TikTok continue to challenge these assertions, questioning the evidence behind the security concerns.
Both TikTok and the Justice Department have requested a ruling by December 6, which could pave the way for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in before any potential ban goes into effect. As the legal clock ticks down, the outcome of this case will have significant implications for ByteDance, the millions of TikTok users in the U.S. and the broader conversation on U.S.-China relations.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh