US President Donald Trump’s nominee for Attorney General, William Barr, said on Tuesday, January 15, he favors strong enforcement of US antitrust laws and would examine statistics showing that scrutiny of mergers is at historic lows.
“The purpose of the antitrust laws, obviously, is to protect competition,” Barr said in response to a question from Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah). Barr said that competition is ultimately good for consumers, but he suggested that he needs to look more into the topic.
“At the same time, I’m sort of interested in stepping back and re-assessing, or learning more about how the Antitrust Division has been functioning and what their priorities are. I don’t think big is necessarily bad but I think a lot of people wonder how such huge behemoths that now exist in Silicon Valley have taken shape under the nose of the antitrust enforcers… I want to find out more about that dynamic.” Barr stated.
Barr expressed his concerns amid increased scrutiny in Washington over the growth of tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Amazon. The Federal Trade Commission has been examining the effectiveness of antitrust laws in a series of hearings, but it is unclear if that will ultimately lead to any changes in legislation.
Barr also said that he would “absolutely” recuse himself from the Justice Department’s (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit against the AT&T-Time Warner merger. A three-judge panel is considering the the DOJ’s appeal.
Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota) asked Barr about his prior criticism of the DOJ’s decision to try to block the transaction. When he was a board member of Time Warner, Barr wrote an affidavit in support of AT&T-Time Warner’s contention that resistance to the merger was politically motivated. He wrote in the affidavit that cited Trump’s “prior public animus toward this merger” as a reason many would view the lawsuit as political motivated.
But at the confirmation hearing, Barr toned down his criticism. He said that his affidavit “speaks for itself,” and that he was expressing concern that the DOJ’s Antitrust Division “wasn’t engaging in some of our arguments…I am not sure why they acted the way they did.”
Full Content: Variety
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
EU Probes Meta Over Potential AI Restrictions on WhatsApp
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
Netflix’s $72bn Purchase Bid Triggers Concerns Over Consumer Choice
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Formalizes Limits on Google’s Deals With Apple and AI Expansion
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
Florida Governor DeSantis Pitches AI Bill of Rights for Residents and Local Governments
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
CFTC Gives Formal Blessing to Spot Trading of Crypto on Registered Exchange
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Intellectual Property
Nov 19, 2025 by
CPI
Dealing in Intellectual Property: IP Justifications and Defenses in Digital Markets Cases
Nov 19, 2025 by
Jennifer Dixton
The Evolving Role of Innovation Theories of Harm in the Antitrust Analysis of Life Science Mergers
Nov 19, 2025 by
Michelle Yost Hale, Matthew D. McDonald & Merrill Stovroff
Who Can Fix It? Antitrust, IP Rights, and the Right to Repair
Nov 19, 2025 by
Rosa M. Morales
Copyright, Antitrust, and the Politics of Generative AI
Nov 19, 2025 by
Daryl Lim