In this issue: More on the HMT Gregory Werden, Apr 10, 2008 Critical Loss: Not Implementing the Hypothetical Monopolist Test! Reply to Coate & Fischer’s response to the author’s original article in which he argues that a style of critical loss calculation, termed “CLAD”, does not properly implement the hypothetical monopolist test for market delineation […]

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Damien Gerard, Apr 23, 2008 The publication of the Discussion Paper in December 2005 sparked tremendous interest in the EC antitrust community and, indeed, much beyond. The Commission received no less than 107 contributions from all over the world in the framework of […]

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Liza Lovdahl-Gormsen, Apr 15, 2008 The question that is the title of this article is very topical as the five-year anniversary of the initiation of the Commission’s June 2003 internal policy review of Article 82 EC approaches. The answer to the question is […]

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Cani Fernandez, Apr 16, 2008 During the 1990s, the European Commission started to reform the competition system, gradually leading it towards a more economic approach. This resulted in the publication of guidelines on vertical restraints and the application of Article 81(3) of the […]

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Gregory Werden, Apr 10, 2008 I recently argued in this magazine that a style of critical loss calculation I termed “CLAD” (Critical Loss Analysis by Defendants) does not properly implement the hypothetical monopolist test (HMT) for market delineation and is often highly misleading. […]