A PYMNTS Company

Unilateral Conduct

Causation Confusion – A Response to Judge Ginsburg & Wong-Ervin
 |  Dec 3, 2024

By A. Douglas Melamed1   In a recent column,2 Judge Douglas Ginsburg and Koren Wong-Ervin argue that the default causation standard under Section 2 of the Sherman Act is “the…

Personal Data Exploitation as Excessive Pricing: A Review of the Bundeskartellamt Facebook Case
 |  Nov 27, 2024

In 2019, the Bundeskartellamt sanctioned Facebook (now Meta) for abusing its dominant position in the market for social media for private users by imposing abusive privacy terms and conditions on…

FTC v. Rambus and the De Facto Causation Standard Under Sherman Section 2
 |  Nov 18, 2024

By Douglas H. Ginsburg & Koren W. Wong-Ervin*   There is currently confusion in the United States over the proper causation standard under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, with…

Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
 |  Sep 27, 2024

Dear Readers, Refusal to deal is one of the classic antitrust violations. In essence, it concerns situations where a dominant firm seeks to exclude its rivals by refusing to sell…

Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
 |  Sep 27, 2024

Antitrust’s refusal-to-deal (“RTD”) doctrine considers situations where a dominant firm excludes rivals by refusing to sell them something that would help them compete. For over a century, the courts have…

Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
 |  Sep 27, 2024

The refusal to deal claim in antitrust is, at its core, a prohibition on discriminatory supply of an input to downstream buyers. However, all in-house production requires such discrimination in…

The Aspen Misadventure
 |  Sep 27, 2024

In this article, we take a retrospective look at the Supreme Court’s decision in Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. We offer several criticisms of the Court’s ruling…

Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
 |  Sep 27, 2024

The antitrust concept of “refusal to deal” addresses situations where a firm declines to engage in a business relationship, often with a competitor or a downstream participant. This concept, while…

Refusal to Deal in the European Union: A Narrowed Scope Expands the Risks for Dominant Firms
 |  Sep 27, 2024

When can EU competition law compel a company to supply its competitors, overriding its contractual freedom and property rights? Recent EU court rulings have clarified that the strict “essential facilities”…

What if Self-Preferencing is Not Refusal to Deal?
 |  Sep 27, 2024

Self-preferencing refers to a business strategy that a company treats preferentially its own product in comparison with its customers’. Such conduct should be in principle allowed, and may be best…

Illuminating the Anti-Coercion Foundations of Refusals to Deal
 |  Sep 27, 2024

For more than a century, anti-coercion has been a foundational principle for refusals to deal and anti-monopolization law in general. Since 2004, however, the Supreme Court has disregarded anti-coercion as…

The EU’s Investigation into Microsoft Teams: A Preliminary Assessment
 |  Sep 18, 2024

By Christian Bergqvist1   Introduction It came somewhat unexpectedly when DG COMP, EU’s competition arm, issued a Statement of Objection (“SO”)2 in June 2024 to Microsoft for having included Teams…

Loading...