In this issue: Abuse of dominance cases in Europe Frederic Jenny, Jan 28, 2008 The CFI Decision in Microsoft: Why the European Commission’s guidelines on abuse of dominance are necessary and possible This note focuses on the “refusal to deal” part of the CFI’s Microsoft decision to derive some conclusions on the advisability and the […]

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Hyungbae Kim, Jan 27, 2008 In the history of Korean competition law enforcement, the decision of the Korean Supreme Court in the refusal to deal case, POSCO, is a milestone in market dominance abuse cases (a concept similar to monopolization under U.S. antitrust […]

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Denis Waelbroeck, Jan 25, 2008 The judgment of the European Court of First Instance in Microsoft raises several issues. In this article, we will look in particular at the main findings regarding the two abuses (refusals to license and product integration). Under the […]

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Frederic Jenny, Jan 28, 2008 The Court of First Instance’s Microsoft decision provided the Court with an opportunity to express its views on several aspects of the current debate on the interpretation of Article 82 of the EC Treaty. This short note focuses […]

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Joseph Hur, Jan 25, 2008 On Nov. 22, 2007, Korea’s Supreme Court rendered its decision in the market dominant position case against Posco. The significance of the Court’s decision will be made clearer as the KFTC turns to other market dominance investigations such […]