The Ripple Effect: Implications of the SEC’s Partial Loss in SEC v. Ripple Labs Inc.

By: Robert Pommer, Jonathan Richman, Joshua M. Newville & Michael Guggenheim (Proskauer)
The SEC faced a major setback in its ongoing legal battle against Ripple concerning the XRP digital token. While the District Court ruled that Ripple’s initial sales of XRP to institutional investors were indeed the sale of unregistered securities, the victory felt hollow, akin to a Pyrrhic triumph, as the court determined that all other methods of Ripple’s sale or distribution of XRP did not involve unregistered securities. Notably, the court found that Ripple’s program of selling XRP to public buyers through digital asset exchanges, as well as their distribution of XRP as compensation to employees and third parties, did not qualify as offering or selling securities. Furthermore, the court dismissed the SEC’s arguments that Ripple utilized institutional buyers as underwriters to sell XRP to the public…
Featured News
Beijing Court Upholds Copyright in Landmark Decision on AI-Generated Images
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Price-Fixing Scandal Rocks European Construction Giants in US Court
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Google Ad Chief Jerry Dischler Steps Down Amid Antitrust Scrutiny
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Meta’s Ad-Free Subscription Service Faces EU Legal Challenge
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
UK Court Empowers Antitrust Watchdog to Probe Apple’s Dominance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI