This week a federal appeals court affirmed a judge’s ruling in favor of chemical company DuPont in a lawsuit alleging price-fixing involving a widely used industrial pigment.
The Third Circuit court panel on Monday, October 2, upheld a Delaware judge’s decision last year granting summary judgment to DuPont in a lawsuit brought by the Valspar Corporation, a Minnesota-based manufacturer of paints and coatings.
Valspar claimed that it was overcharged US$176 million for titanium dioxide after DuPont conspired with three other companies starting in 2002 to control the price of the whitening pigment, resulting in 31 parallel price increases by the companies over the next 12 years.
DuPont argued that the pricing was the natural consequence of the marketplace. The judge ruled that evidence of an actual agreement to fix prices was lacking.
Full Content: New York Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Beijing Court Upholds Copyright in Landmark Decision on AI-Generated Images
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Price-Fixing Scandal Rocks European Construction Giants in US Court
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Google Ad Chief Jerry Dischler Steps Down Amid Antitrust Scrutiny
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Meta’s Ad-Free Subscription Service Faces EU Legal Challenge
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
UK Court Empowers Antitrust Watchdog to Probe Apple’s Dominance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI