
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has sent letters to lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle, on both the House and Senate Judiciary committees, endorsing antitrust proposals that aim to block tech giants from giving preferential treatment to their own products.
“If enacted, we believe that this legislation has the potential to have a positive effect on dynamism in digital markets going forward. Our future global competitiveness depends on innovators and entrepreneurs having the ability to access markets free from dominant incumbents that impede innovation, competition, resiliency, and widespread prosperity,” acting Assistant Attorney General Peter Hyun wrote in the letters.
The letters were sent to top members of the Judiciary committees and the antitrust subcommittees. The letter to senators was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
This communication marks the Biden administration’s most direct endorsement of the American Online Innovation and Choice Act, a piece of progressive legislation that has caused waves among tech sector analysts, businesses and observers, with deep divisions over those who support and those who oppose the act’s provisions, methods, or objectives.
The legislation would block dominant online companies, determined by user base and revenue, from preferring their own goods or discriminating against rival products on their platforms. The definition would likely mean the bill would apply to Amazon, Apple, Meta and Google, the so-called Tech Giants that have come to dominate much of our modern tech landscape.
Read More: Publisher Trade Group Backs Two US Big Tech Antitrust Bills
The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced the proposal in a bipartisan vote in January, and the House Judiciary Committee advanced a version of the bill in bipartisan vote in June as part of a raft of antitrust bills against Big Tech.
Tech giants and industry groups representing them have lobbied heavily against the legislation. But relatively smaller tech companies, including Yelp, Sonos and Basecamp, have backed the proposal as a way to level the market.
Despite advancing out of committees with bipartisan support, the fate of the bill is still rocky.
During January’s vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee, even lawmakers on both sides of the aisle who voted in favor of advancing the bill raised concerns about the legislation they said they wanted to see addressed before supporting it on the floor.
Featured News
CMA Appoints Joel Bamford as Executive Director for Mergers
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Alibaba Health’s $1.73 Billion Deal to Boost Online Health Store Services
Nov 28, 2023 by
CPI
Nvidia Faces Global Regulatory Scrutiny Amid Antitrust Investigations
Nov 28, 2023 by
CPI
Meta Plans Appeal Following Judge’s Ruling in Privacy Battle with FTC
Nov 28, 2023 by
CPI
Tiger Woods Voices Discontent Over PGA Tour’s Saudi Agreement
Nov 28, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Consent Decrees
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
Consent Decrees Under the Biden Administration
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
The FTC´s Prior Approval Mischief
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
Fix-It-First: A Seismic Shift in U.S. Antitrust Agency Approaches to Merger Remedies
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
“Shadow” Settlements and the Tunney Act
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI