A judge on Tuesday, February 20, denied AT&T’s request to see White House communications that might shed light on whether US President Donald Trump pressured the Department of Justice (DOJ) to try to block the wireless carrier’s purchase of Time Warner.
The decision is a potential setback to AT&T’s plan to argue in an upcoming trial that the department’s decision to oppose the acquisition was politically motivated, perhaps spurred on by Trump’s public criticism of the deal and his frequent attacks on Time Warner’s CNN.
“Defendants have fallen far short of establishing that this enforcement action was selective,” Judge Leon said.The decision puts a crimp in AT&T’s defense for its US$85 billion proposed merger with Time Warner. And it is a big win for th DOJ, which would like to avoid attention on the role of politics in its decision to stop the deal. The merger would transform the media landscape by combining a television and movie giant with one of the nation’s biggest media distributors.
“We respect the judge’s decision and look forward to the upcoming trial,” said Dan Petrocelli, lead trial lawyer for both Time Warner and AT&T.
In a statement, the DOJ said, “We are pleased with and respect today’s decision, which will permit the parties and court to focus on the case at hand.”
AT&T has argued that the DOJ has unfairly singled out its proposed merger with Time Warner partly to stay in favor with the White House. President Trump has been a vocal critic of Time Warner’s news network, CNN, and said before the election that the deal should be stopped.
Full Content: The New York Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Beijing Court Upholds Copyright in Landmark Decision on AI-Generated Images
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Price-Fixing Scandal Rocks European Construction Giants in US Court
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Google Ad Chief Jerry Dischler Steps Down Amid Antitrust Scrutiny
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Meta’s Ad-Free Subscription Service Faces EU Legal Challenge
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
UK Court Empowers Antitrust Watchdog to Probe Apple’s Dominance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI