The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Wednesday, December 6, denied Valspar Corp.’s request for an en banc rehearing of a decision to toss a US$176 million antitrust lawsuit accusing DuPont of conspiring to fix the price of a paint ingredient.
Judge Thomas Hardiman said in a one-page order that the court declined to revisit a split decision from October affirming a lower court’s ruling that Valspar failed to prove the Wilmington-based chemical giant engaged in a scheme with competitors to fix the price of titanium dioxide.
Attorneys for Valspar had petitioned for a rehearing before the whole court, saying the opinion ”eviscerates” antitrust protections by establishing an “unprecedented summary judgment standard for plaintiffs trying to prove a price-fixing conspiracy” in the appeals court.
Full Content: Law 360
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Alaska Airlines’ Hawaiian Acquisition Faces Antitrust Scrutiny
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
Ulmer & Greensfelder Merge to Form UB Greensfelder
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
Apple’s iMessage May Be Exempt from New EU Regulations
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
UK Watchdog Warns Firms on AI Privacy Compliance
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
FTC Mounts Second Challenge to Microsoft’s Activision Buy Despite Closed Deal
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI