Late Payments Just Lost Their Best Hiding Spot

For most of corporate history, a late payment was a back-office inconvenience. Accounts receivable teams called, reminded, escalated and eventually negotiated repayment schedules. The issue was operational and largely accepted as the cost of doing business.

That tolerance is running out. As economic volatility reshapes corporate growth cycles, CFOs are being forced to reexamine costs they once treated as unavoidable. What used to register as a routine a collections delay now appears as a working capital risk, and finance leaders want to see it coming.

The shift has elevated enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems from passive accounting infrastructure into active cash flow intelligence platforms. Modern ERP automation tools are no longer limited to recording transactions after the fact. They are being used to predict payment behavior, identify deteriorating customer patterns, automate collections workflows and provide treasury teams with earlier visibility into potential disruptions before they affect the balance sheet.

After all, as economic volatility reshapes corporate growth cycles, late payments are being understood as early warning signals for liquidity pressure, margin compression and forecasting instability.

See more: CFOs Tackle B2B Payments Delinquency by Using Data and AI

Late Payments Become a Treasury Problem

In many organizations, the ERP system is becoming the operational center of working capital management. Traditional ERP environments excelled at documenting financial activity but struggled to interpret it. Finance teams could see outstanding invoices and aging reports, but visibility often arrived too late to materially improve outcomes. By the time a payment issue appeared in monthly reporting, treasury teams were already adjusting liquidity assumptions.

The latest generation of ERP automation changes that equation. Instead of relying solely on payment terms or invoice due dates, systems increasingly analyze behavioral indicators across customer accounts. Payment timing trends, dispute frequency, approval bottlenecks, purchasing slowdowns and historical collections patterns are combined to generate risk assessments in real time. A customer that consistently paid within 30 days but suddenly shifts toward 45-day settlement cycles may trigger alerts before invoices formally become overdue.

For CFOs, the value is less about collections acceleration alone and more about forecasting precision. If finance teams can identify emerging payment risk two or three weeks earlier, they gain time to adjust borrowing strategies, rebalance payables, revise cash forecasts or intervene with customers proactively.

PYMNTS and Visa research has shown that cash flow certainty is closely linked to confidence in growth. When finance leaders can trust their liquidity position, they are more willing to invest, extend supplier terms and accelerate payroll or vendor payments without fear of shortfalls. Elsewhere, PYMNTS Intelligence data found that 77.9% of CFOs see improving the cash flow cycle as “very or extremely important” to their strategy in the year ahead.

See also: Treasury Is the New Glass Ceiling for Growing Companies

Automation Reshapes the Collections Function

The collections process itself is also becoming increasingly automated, reducing dependence on manual outreach and fragmented workflows. Invoices can trigger automated reminder sequences based on customer risk profiles, payment history or invoice size. Disputes can be routed automatically to the appropriate operational teams, while escalation workflows assign priority based on aging thresholds or exposure levels. Finance leaders can also establish dynamic collections strategies that adjust according to customer behavior.

The automation does not eliminate the human side of collections. Instead, it changes where human attention is directed. Rather than spending time on repetitive administrative tasks, collections teams focus increasingly on exception management, customer negotiations and high-risk accounts where intervention can materially affect cash recovery.

The growing focus on ERP automation reflects a larger shift in corporate finance priorities. For much of the past decade, organizations emphasized revenue growth, digital transformation and operational scalability. Working capital often received less executive attention during periods of abundant liquidity and low borrowing costs.

Read also: Why CFOs Who Prioritize Cash Flow Improvements Start With Receivables Innovation

But with capital costs rising and investors scrutinizing cash efficiency more closely, finance leaders are under pressure to improve liquidity performance without sacrificing growth. Days sales outstanding, cash conversion cycles and forecast reliability have moved higher on executive agendas. A delayed payment is rarely just a finance issue. It may originate from procurement disputes, shipping delays, inaccurate invoicing, contract mismatches or customer service breakdowns. Modern ERP automation allows organizations to connect those operational signals earlier, creating more coordinated responses across departments.

The result is not simply faster collections. It is earlier awareness of cash disruption, more accurate forecasting, and greater control over working capital performance. In an environment where liquidity management has become a competitive differentiator, those capabilities are increasingly viewed as strategic necessities rather than back-office enhancements.

Data in the report “Ready and Willing: B2B Payments Are Headed for Real-Time Rails. Here’s How They’re Getting There,” a collaboration between PYMNTS Intelligence and The Clearing House, finds that firms using real-time payment rails consistently report materially better outcomes across nearly every operational metric that matters, from liquidity management and reconciliation to supplier relationships and strategic flexibility.

For all PYMNTS B2B and digital transformation coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B and Digital Transformation Newsletter.