The $100 Million CFO Doesn’t Keep Score. They Call the Plays.

Median chief financial officer compensation in the S&P 500 reached $6 million in 2025, up from roughly $5.8 million in 2024, The Wall Street Journal reported June 22.

At least seven chief financial officers were paid more than $100 million last year, with Tim McHugh, co-president and CFO of Welltower, taking the top spot and pulling in a record $167 million.

While the surge in CFO compensation is easy to dismiss as another executive pay story, it is more interesting as a management story. In an economy shaped by artificial intelligence investment, elevated interest rates, geopolitical uncertainty and increasingly complex capital markets, finance is no longer simply reporting on strategy. It is helping determine it.

Companies are paying CFOs more because they are asking them to do more. Record CFO pay should therefore be viewed less as an isolated compensation phenomenon than as a market signal about the capabilities companies believe will generate future returns.

Read also: Two Years Ago vs. Today: CFOs and the ERP Shift

The Balance Sheet Has Become a Competitive Weapon

For much of modern corporate history, the CFO was viewed as the executive responsible for measuring performance after strategic decisions had already been made. The CEO set the vision. Business unit leaders drove growth. The CFO kept score. That division of labor is becoming difficult to recognize.

As automation reduces time spent producing financial information, finance leaders are spending more time interpreting it. They serve as the executive translating market volatility, technological disruption and capital constraints into enterprise-wide decisions.

Nearly every major strategic decision today now begins with questions that fall squarely within a CFO’s remit. How aggressively should the company invest in AI infrastructure? Should it lease computing capacity or build proprietary data centers? Is now the right time to pursue acquisitions or preserve liquidity? Should excess cash fund stock buybacks, debt reduction or long-term technology investments? How should the business protect itself against tariff uncertainty or rising borrowing costs?

These decisions are no longer purely financial. They are strategic decisions with financial consequences. As the cost of capital has risen, the margin for error has narrowed. A poorly timed investment or an overextended balance sheet can erase years of operational progress. Conversely, disciplined capital deployment can become a durable competitive advantage even in slow-growth markets.

The PYMNTS Intelligence report “Time to Cash: A New Measure of Business Resilience” found that 77.9% of CFOs see improving the cash flow cycle as “very or extremely important” to their strategy in the year ahead.

The expanding role of finance also reflects the increasing convergence of corporate functions that once operated independently. Treasury decisions now influence procurement strategy and vice versa, technology investments affect working capital, and supply chain resilience shapes financing needs, while payment infrastructure overlaps with customer experience. Decisions about software procurement can alter liquidity management for years.

Rather than managing isolated financial processes, CFOs are coordinating interconnected systems that determine how capital moves through an organization.

See also: The 7 AI Terms Every CFO Needs to Understand

AI Is Turning Strategy Into Capital Allocation

For many companies, AI is no longer a discretionary technology initiative. It represents one of the largest capital allocation decisions in years. Billions of dollars are being committed to cloud infrastructure, semiconductor capacity, software platforms and workforce transformation without clear precedents for measuring long-term returns.

The PYMNTS Intelligence report “Smart Spending: How AI Is Transforming Financial Decision Making” found more than 80% of CFOs at large companies are either already using AI or considering adopting it.

The modern corporation is competing in an environment where financing strategy, technological investment and operational execution have become intertwined. As those boundaries continue to blur, boards are placing greater value on executives capable of navigating all three simultaneously.

The CFO is not replacing the CEO or becoming the singular center of corporate decision-making. Successful organizations will continue to rely on complementary leadership across operations, technology, product and finance.

What is changing is the balance of influence. The finance function has evolved from measuring business performance to helping shape it.

“What real-time transaction data is doing is enabling us to have a forward-looking assessment,” Boost Payment Solutions Chief Technology Officer Rinku Sharma told PYMNTS in April. “The question used to be what happened. Now the question is, what should we do about it right now?”

As AI reshapes investment cycles, capital remains more expensive than it was a decade ago, and software transforms nearly every business model into an ongoing exercise in capital allocation, the executives controlling financial strategy inevitably become central to corporate strategy itself.

For all PYMNTS B2B coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B Newsletter.

The post The $100 Million CFO Doesn’t Keep Score. They Call the Plays. appeared first on PYMNTS.com.