Banking’s Next AI Risk Is Cyber Autonomy

Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer just helping cybersecurity teams find suspicious activity. It is starting to find vulnerabilities, test attack paths and, in some cases, act in ways that stretch the limits of the systems built to contain it.

A clear directional signal for the landscape came Friday (Aug. 7), when OpenAI said preliminary tests of its upcoming Astra model were strong enough that the company could not rule out its highest cybersecurity warning level, known as the “Critical” threshold. Under OpenAI’s preparedness framework, that level means a model may be able to independently discover and develop working zero-day exploits against real-world systems or carry out cyberattacks from a high-level objective.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) reached a similar conclusion from a financial-stability perspective in a recent report. The organization’s central argument for its note entitled “Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity in the Financial Sector” was that AI does not need to invent fundamentally new forms of cyberattack to change the risk equation. By accelerating vulnerability discovery and exploitation across shared technologies, AI can turn weaknesses that once produced isolated incidents into correlated disruptions affecting multiple institutions simultaneously.

That is a major development because the question is no longer only whether AI can write better phishing emails or help security teams sort through alerts. The question is what powerful models can do when given tools, credentials, network access or a poorly configured test environment.

For banks, FinTechs, merchants and critical infrastructure operators, that changes AI cyber risk from a security-team concern into an enterprise governance problem. The question is no longer simply whether companies should use AI in cybersecurity. It is how much autonomy those systems should receive, what they should be allowed to touch and whether organizations can contain them when something goes wrong.

See more: Wall Street’s New Cybersecurity Threat Starts With a Phone Call

The Cyber Capability Threshold Is Moving to Everywhere All at Once

The significance is less about one model than about where the capability curve is headed. The uncomfortable feature of advanced cyber AI is that its most valuable defensive capabilities are also its most obvious offensive ones.

The IMF described this as a dual-use problem: vulnerability discovery, penetration testing, automated code review and patch prioritization can strengthen defenses, but the capabilities can also be repurposed to attack systems. More autonomous models further compress response times because they can execute multistep operations with less continuous human involvement.

The primary issue for financial services is that modern banks are collections of interdependent technologies. Core banking systems, payment networks, cloud workloads, open-source libraries, identity infrastructure and third-party applications make up what we think of as the world’s financial backbone. The IMF warned that this shared architecture creates correlated exposure, with AI increasing the speed at which common vulnerabilities can be discovered and targeted across institutions.

See also: AI Gives Cybersecurity a Backlog CFOs and CISOs Can’t Patch Away

Institutions need architectures designed to limit the “blast radius” of successful breaches through segmentation, zero-trust approaches, disciplined access controls and stronger third-party oversight. Prevention alone is no longer enough; detection, containment and recovery must operate at comparable speed.

That matters for banks and FinTechs because AI cybersecurity may soon be embedded inside the consulting, managed security and software platforms they already use. The model may not sit on a bank’s balance sheet as a new technology purchase, but it may still influence how vulnerabilities are found, ranked and fixed.

OpenAI said its own Daybreak AI defense system is being distributed through Accenture, IBM, Capgemini, EY, KPMG, PwC, Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, Cisco, Sophos, Akamai, Fortinet and Cloudflare, among others, according to its Daybreak partner page.

The boardroom implication follows directly. AI cyber risk is becoming less about whether a particular model is safe and more about whether the organization surrounding it is resilient. The competitive advantage may belong to the company that knows exactly what a model can reach—and can shut the door before capability becomes exposure.

For all PYMNTS AI coverage, subscribe to the daily AI Newsletter .