Gig Workers Want Real-Time Pay for Real-Time Work

Watch more: Gig Workers Want Real-Time Pay for Real-Time Costs

The expansion of the gig economy has coincided with a fundamental change in how workers think about income, as wages are no longer treated as something that arrives on a schedule but as liquidity that should be available at the moment they are earned.

That expectation has moved instant payments from the margins of platform design into a central operating requirement, particularly for workers whose costs accumulate throughout the day.

Ankush Singhal, director of product management, money movement at Galileo Financial Technologies, SoFi’s tech platform, told PYMNTS the move is part of a broader change in expectations that extends beyond gig work but is most visible there because of how tightly expenses and earnings are linked.

Gig workers, he noted, are “hit the hardest” by economic volatility because they absorb costs directly, from fuel to maintenance, without an intermediary to buffer those expenses.

When outflows occur continuously, inflows that lag by even a day begin to feel misaligned with the reality of the work.

That dynamic has become more pronounced in periods of rising costs. Delivery and ride-hailing workers, for example, often face fuel expenses that must be paid before they can continue earning.

In those cases, payout timing is not simply a matter of convenience. It determines whether a worker can remain active on the platform. As Singhal put it, “when their expenses are happening in real time, they expect the payments also to happen in real time.”

Inflation Pressures Make Payout Speed Operational

The connection between payout timing and day-to-day economics is particularly visible in scenarios tied to fuel and other immediate costs. Platforms such as DoorDash have explored faster disbursement mechanisms to help workers offset those expenses, including high gas prices, effectively linking earnings access to the ability to continue working.

In that context, payment speed becomes a form of operational support rather than a financial feature. A driver who completes deliveries but cannot access earnings quickly enough to refill a tank faces an interruption in income generation. The structure of the work leaves little room for delay.

Instant Expectations Were Already Taking Hold

While current economic conditions have sharpened the issue, the shift toward immediate payouts predates recent volatility. Singhal described it as part of a broader change in consumer expectations across financial services.

“This expectation is changing across the board,” he said, pointing to the influence of digital payment experiences that have normalized instant access to funds. Gig workers are simply the segment where the consequences of delay are most visible.

The spread of peer-to-peer payment apps has reinforced that expectation. “They are used to sending money to their friends instantly,” Singhal said, so there is “no reason why they would not expect the same when it comes to their earned wages.”

From Cost Center to Competitive Lever

Singhal noted that platforms are recognizing payout flexibility “as a retention lever, not a cost center,” particularly in a labor environment where workers can choose between competing platforms. Access to earnings becomes part of the value proposition, alongside compensation rates and working conditions.

This reframing has implications for how platforms invest in payments infrastructure. Faster payouts are no longer optional enhancements. They are tied to acquisition, engagement and retention.

Legacy Infrastructure Shows Its Limits

Meeting those expectations requires more than enabling a faster payment option. It requires rethinking systems that were designed for a different operating model.

Singhal pointed out that legacy payout systems were “built around batch processing and predictable pay cycles,” relying on cutoff times and scheduled settlement windows. Those assumptions do not hold in an environment where funds are expected to move continuously.

Multi-Rail Complexity Creates Operational Strain

The challenge becomes more acute as platforms adopt multiple payment rails to meet different use cases. Push-to-card transactions offer near-instant access, while account-to-account transfers through newer networks provide alternative paths for moving funds. ACH, though slower, remains embedded in payroll and benefits.

Each of these rails carries its own settlement timing, risk profile and operational requirements. As platforms layer them together, the absence of coordination can lead to fragmentation.

To address that fragmentation, platforms are moving toward more unified approaches to managing multiple payout options. The goal is to help platforms choose the right payment method for the situation.

“It’s not just the access to the rails, but it’s all about this orchestration around these rails,” Singhal told PYMNTS, emphasizing the need for systems that can route transactions based on context and maintain visibility throughout the payment lifecycle.

Such systems must account for differences in settlement timing, liquidity requirements and compliance obligations, while presenting a simplified interface to both users and internal teams.

Embedded Payments Bring Financial Tools Into the Workflow

The next stage of this evolution extends beyond infrastructure into the user experience. Embedded payout capabilities let workers access funds directly within the platform, allowing workers to access and manage funds without leaving the app.

This approach aligns the financial experience with the workflow itself. A worker completes a task, accesses earnings and deploys those funds within the same interface.

Singhal said embedding these capabilities “increases the trust” and “improves the experience,” for users, while also reinforcing retention by keeping users engaged within a single ecosystem.

Next-Generation Payout Systems Hide the Complexity

The direction of development points toward systems that combine multi-rail access, integrated compliance and real-time operations within a single framework. These systems are designed to conceal complexity rather than expose it.

Singhal described the next phase as one where the emphasis shifts from building rails to making them usable. As he told PYMNTS, the industry is moving toward a model where access to faster payments is no longer limited by scale or technical resources, but becomes broadly available as part of the platform infrastructure itself. “The next few years are going to be about operational tooling around it so that we make all of these things accessible … not just to big organizations … but to anyone,” he predicted.