House Cuts Voting Days as Crypto Bill Faces Senate Test

Washington just sped up the clock on crypto regulation. And it could make the prospect of getting anything signed into law this year a ticking time bomb.

House Republican leaders have canceled voting sessions for the final two weeks of September, removing eight legislative days and putting representatives on track to leave Washington Sept. 17. That is just two days after the Senate is scheduled to hold its first major procedural vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.

The timing creates an unusual possibility where crypto could finally clear one of its biggest remaining political hurdles and still run out of time to turn that victory into law before the November midterms. That matters beyond Washington. Banks, exchanges, stablecoin issuers, asset managers and payments companies are already making investment decisions around a U.S. regulatory regime that, at one point, looked inevitable but whose final architecture now remains uncertain.

See also: How the SEC Went From Crypto Enforcement to Building an On-Chain Wall Street

Sept. 15 Becomes Crypto Regulation’s Starting Line, Not the Finish

The GENIUS Act established a federal framework for payment stablecoins in 2025. Regulators have continued developing rules for digital assets, and the Clarity Act would go substantially further by establishing a broader statutory market structure. The House has already passed the act, approving it 294-134 in July 2025 with 78 Democrats joining Republicans.

In theory, if the Senate approved exactly that legislation, no additional House vote would be necessary.

But the Senate’s Sept. 15 vote is not final passage on the Clarity Act. Senators are scheduled to vote on cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633. Sixty votes are needed to advance the legislation toward debate. Even if supporters get them, the Senate could still need to consider amendments before voting on the legislation itself. Senators have spent months developing their own approach to market structure. If the Senate changes the House legislation, both chambers ultimately have to approve identical text before it can go to the president.

Before the House calendar changed, there was at least time for that process to unfold. Now, the House could be empty while the Senate works.

“When you have a federal law, it sets the playing field for what is OK versus not,” Tempo Go-To-Market Lead Dan Romero told PYMNTS on an episode of “From the Block,” published in June. For the first time, he added, crypto has had “a regulatory tailwind, not a headwind.”

The PYMNTS Intelligence and Citi report “Chain Reaction: Regulatory Clarity as the Catalyst for Blockchain Adoption” found that regulation will shape blockchain’s next leap. The regulatory debate around stablecoins often appears novel. In reality, however, many policy decisions reflect lessons drawn from centuries of monetary history.

There is still a path for the Clarity Act. A strong bipartisan Senate showing could give congressional leaders an incentive to finish the legislation after the election. A lame-duck session can also create its own urgency, particularly if election results suggest the political environment will be less favorable in January.

But the industry is approaching an important inflection point. The next scheduled House voting day is Nov. 9, after the Nov. 3 midterms.

Read more: SEC Rulemaking Is Giving Corporate Finance a New Crypto Hurdle Rate

Federal Regulatory Guidance Is Arriving Without Congress

There is another reason the calendar matters. Washington is not standing still while Congress negotiates. The SEC has been advancing its own crypto regulatory framework, while Chair Paul Atkins has argued that congressional legislation remains necessary to make those changes durable.

A crypto-native company may be willing to launch under an emerging SEC or CFTC framework. A global bank deciding whether to commit hundreds of millions of dollars to custody, tokenization, stablecoin or trading infrastructure may require something harder to reverse.

“CFOs are, rightly so, conservative,”  Tanner Taddeo, CEO of Stable Sea, told PYMNTS in an earlier interview this year. “They’re not buying innovation. They’re buying to de-risk something.”

The industry still hasn’t found a solution to prevent criminals from exploiting the technology, and until it does, expanding access without enhanced guardrails mostly expands harm, Andrew Balthazor, associate and co-lead of the crypto asset disputes team at Holland and Knight LLP, told PYMNTS in February during a discussion for a “From the Block” podcast with PYMNTS CEO Karen Webster and Citi Global Head of Digital Assets for Treasury and Trade Solutions Ryan Rugg.

Cross-border B2B payments account for the majority of global stablecoin payment volume, according to findings in the July edition of the Payments Innovation Tracker® Series, a PYMNTS Intelligence collaboration with Paymentology.

For all PYMNTS B2B and digital transformation coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B and Digital Transformation Newsletters.