Cybersecurity’s Hottest New Job Is Negotiating With Hackers

In the escalating cybersecurity arms race, the enterprise’s most valuable asset may no longer be its defense perimeter but rather someone who knows how to talk to the hackers.

With cybercrime and ransomware surging while bad actors become institutionalized, companies are now turning to a new class of specialists to manage the fallout when their defenses are breached and their data stolen: the ransomware negotiator.

A report from the Financial Times noted a recent “increase in demand” for ransom negotiators at cybersecurity firms including Palo Alto Networks and Sophos.

Unlike traditional cybersecurity professionals, whose focus is prevention and defense, negotiators are deployed after a breach has already occurred. Their role is not to stop the attack but to manage its consequences. That requires a different skill set: psychological acuity, cultural awareness, financial strategy and a deep understanding of how cybercriminal groups operate.

See also: The Cybersecurity Hit List: From Enterprise AI to Compromised Coffee Machines

Navigating the Rise of the Extortion Economy

Ransomware has become a structured, global industry. Organized cybercriminal groups now operate with business-like efficiency. Attacks are no longer limited to encrypting files; they often involve “double extortion,” where attackers threaten to leak stolen data if payment is not made.

The PYMNTS Intelligence report “Vendors and Vulnerabilities: The Cyberattack Squeeze on Mid-Market Firms” found that hackers are increasingly going after middle-market firms, which depend on third-party cloud providers, software-as-a-service platforms, managed service and logistics providers, which can leave them vulnerable to attack.

Ransomware negotiation is less about technical expertise and more about human interaction, albeit often through encrypted chat portals and anonymous communication channels. Negotiators must quickly assess the attacker’s credibility, determine whether stolen data will actually be released and gauge how flexible the ransom demand might be.

The process often begins with intelligence gathering. Experienced negotiators maintain databases of known ransomware groups, tracking their tactics, reliability and historical behavior. Some groups are known to honor payments and provide decryption keys; others are less predictable. This intelligence shapes the negotiation strategy.

One of the most contentious questions in ransomware incidents is whether to pay. Governments and law enforcement agencies generally discourage payment, arguing that it fuels the cybercrime economy and incentivizes further attacks. Yet for many companies, the decision is more pragmatic than philosophical.

This role raises complex ethical and legal questions. Negotiating with criminals can be seen as legitimizing their activities. In some jurisdictions, paying certain groups may even violate sanctions laws. Negotiators must navigate these constraints carefully, often working closely with legal counsel and law enforcement.

Read more: FBI Warns: Internal Risk May Outpace Cyber Threats

The Future of Cybercrime Power Dynamics

Last year, there were over 2,000 data breach lawsuits filed, Philip Yannella, co-chair of the privacy, security and data protection practice at Blank Rome and author of “Cyber Litigation: Data Breach, Data Privacy & Digital Rights,” 2025 edition, told PYMNTS in an earlier interview.

“Data breaches are always the biggest danger,” he said.

The emergence of ransomware negotiators reflects a broader shift in how organizations think about cyber risk. It is no longer solely a technical problem; it is a business risk that requires strategic management. In this sense, negotiators function as a form of corporate diplomat, engaging with adversaries to protect organizational interests.

The utilization of negotiation professionals also may signal a shift in the balance of power within the cybercrime landscape. While attackers continue to innovate and expand, victims are no longer entirely reactive. Through negotiation, they can exert a degree of control over outcomes, even in the midst of a breach.

Perhaps the most striking aspect of ransomware negotiation is how fundamentally human it is. Despite the technical nature of cyberattacks, their resolution often hinges on communication, psychology and trust — or at least the illusion of it.

Negotiators must manage not only the attackers but also the internal stakeholders within the victim organization. Executives, legal teams, IT departments and public relations professionals all have competing priorities and perspectives. The negotiator becomes a central coordinator, translating technical realities into business decisions.

This does not mean that negotiation is a substitute for strong cybersecurity. Prevention remains critical. Research from the PYMNTS Intelligence report “The AI MonitorEdge Report: COOs Leverage GenAI to Reduce Data Security Losses” showed that 55% of companies are employing AI-powered cybersecurity measures.