The Digital Economy’s Longest-Running Grudge Matches

In the digital economy, not every war is fought over market share. Some are fought over principle, some over pricing and some, let’s be honest, because an adult in a black turtleneck or Patagonia vest simply cannot let that one comment go. Payments, banking and tech are supposed to be the sober plumbing of modern commerce. Yet every so often the pipes start rattling, the founders start sniping and the rest of us get front-row seats to a boardroom soap opera with better margins.

As of March 2026, the current card has some worthy headliners. OpenAI and Anthropic are no longer just competing for model benchmarks; the rivalry has spilled into the race for enterprise customers and even Super Bowl-style advertising jabs. Meanwhile, Amazon and Perplexity have turned the future of AI shopping into a courtroom cage match after Amazon won a temporary order blocking Perplexity’s shopping agent from using its platform. The modern digital economy, in other words, is not post-drama. It has simply upgraded the drama stack.

The Legit Beefs

Take Apple versus Epic Games, which may be the most important payments-adjacent fight of the mobile era. Epic’s core complaint was simple: Apple’s App Store rules and commissions made alternative payment paths painfully hard to use. In 2025, a federal judge said Apple violated an earlier injunction meant to loosen those restrictions, after Epic argued that Apple’s new setup — including a 27% fee on some off-app purchases — made external payments commercially unworkable. An appeals court then ruled the judge needed to take into consideration that Apple could make a commission, and so the battle continues. This one matters because it is not merely a spat between two swaggering brands; it is a referendum on who owns the checkout lane inside the smartphone economy.

And if you want a proto-FinTech feud, the original X.com versus PayPal story still deserves a plaque. Reuters Breakingviews, reviewing Jimmy Soni’s history of the company, recounts that Elon Musk’s X.com and Peter Thiel and Max Levchin’s PayPal became fierce rivals, luring users with referral payments and trying to out-code each other before merging. Then, in classic startup fashion, the external rivalry mutated into an internal one: arguments over technology, branding, and direction ended with Musk’s ouster as CEO. Why was it notable? Because it gave us the PayPal Mafia, the most productive alumni group since the Beatles stopped touring.

The Not-so-Legit, but Undeniably Entertaining Ones

Not every professional beef is a noble battle over fees, rails or consumer choice. Some are just elite grievance with excellent tailoring. Bill Ackman versus Carl Icahn is the Wall Street gold standard here. In 2013, the two billionaire investors detonated years of acrimony on live television in a shouting match over Herbalife. Reuters described Wall Street as mesmerized. That is the key word. This was notable less because it changed finance forever than because it turned hedge-fund disagreement into appointment viewing — proof that the market can price almost anything except personal animus.

And then there are the patron saints of tech tension: Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Reuters noted in 2007 that their “once-intense rivalry” had mellowed by the time they traded jests onstage, but the mutual antagonism had already entered legend. Jobs later told his biographer that Gates was “unimaginative” and had ripped off other people’s ideas. That feud mattered because it was never just personal. It stood in for two visions of the digital economy: closed versus open, elegance versus ubiquity, cool versus scale. It was also notable because, unlike many corporate grudges, it eventually matured into something like respect, which is perhaps the classiest possible ending for a professional beef.

In Retrospect

The lesson in all of this is comforting in a strange way. Even in industries built on algorithms, rails, underwriting and risk models, business is still gloriously human. The invoices may be automated; the feelings are not. And that may be why these grudge matches endure. They make abstract power visible. They show us who controls the gate, who wants a bigger cut and who absolutely, positively needed to win the meeting. In a world obsessed with frictionless commerce, a little friction between rivals may be the most reliable product of all.