A PYMNTS Company

Hub-and-Spoke Antitrust Conspiracies and the Classic Case of Toys “R” Us v. FTC

By  |  February 26, 2020

Jarod Bona; The Antitrust Attorney

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Like life, sometimes antitrust conspiracies are
    complicated. Not everything always fits into a neat little package. An
    articulate soundbite or an attractive infograph isn’t necessarily enough to
    explain the reality of what is going on.

    The paradigm example of an antitrust conspiracy is the smoke-filled room of competitors with their evil laughs deciding what prices their customers are going to pay, or how they are going to divide up the customers. This is a horizontal conspiracy and is a per se violation of the antitrust laws. Another, less dramatic, part of the real estate of antitrust law involves manufacturers, distributors, and retailers and the prices they set and the deals they make. This usually relates to vertical agreements and typically invites the more-detailed rule-of-reason analysis by courts. One example of this type of an agreement is a resale-price-maintenance agreement…

    Continue Reading…