The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC), the country’s antitrust watchdog, searched the Tokyo headquarters of eCommerce giant Rakuten on Monday (Feb. 10) over complaints about its free shipping policy, reported Reuters.
The JFTC said Rakuten was breaching anti-monopoly laws by taking advantage of its leadership position over smaller online retailers that rely on its platform, sources said.
To compete against Amazon and other competitors, Rakuten had intended to make shipping free for orders above ¥3,980 ($36.26) starting March 18. The company is planning to make marketplace merchants absorb the costs of the platform’s free shipping service. The investigation follows a January petition from roughly 450 merchants that maintained Rakuten is mandating they pay shipping costs.
Hiroshi Mikitani, president of Rakuten, said in a statement that the company is cooperating during the raid, but still plans to move forward with the shipping policy.
Roughly 49,500 Rakuten sellers set their own shipping fees, and some choose to offer free shipping. Some sellers indicated they wouldn’t be able to stay in business without passing on shipping costs to customers.
The group also requested that JFTC look into allegations that some sellers have to use Rakuten’s mobile payment system and must cover the eCommerce giant’s commissions. There were also complaints about unfair company fines for minor rule infractions.
Rakuten was founded as MDM, Inc. in 1997. The name was changed to Rakuten in 1999 and the firm went public in 2000.
Rakuten said in November that it was going to lose ¥103 billion ($947 million) due to its investment in Lyft. Rakuten’s Founder and CEO Hiroshi Mikitani, who sits on Lyft’s board, said shares in the ride-hailing company had “fallen significantly” from July through September. Rakuten is Lyft’s largest shareholder, with an 11 percent stake.
Featured News
NY Laws Requires Disclosure of AI Actors in Ads, Limit Use of Person’s Image After Death
Dec 12, 2025 by
CPI
Three More States to Throw the Switch on Comprehensive Privacy Rules in 2026.
Dec 12, 2025 by
CPI
Dozens of State AGs Demand AI Companies Fix ‘Delusion’ Outputs by Chatbots
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Texas Sues Epic Systems, Accusing Health-Tech Giant of Anticompetitive Data Practices
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Court Affirms Apple Injunction but Trims Limits in Epic Dispute
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Acqui-hiring
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Anticompetitive Effects of Acquihires: Labor and Product Markets
Dec 11, 2025 by
Heski Bar-Isaac, Justin Johnson & Volker Nocke
Acquihires In the Technology Sector: Antitrust Scrutiny Through the Lens of Economics
Dec 11, 2025 by
Juliette Caminade, Rebecca Kirk Fair, Zsolt Udvari & Jeanne Vellard Smith
M&A in the AI Era: Considerations for Acquihiring
Dec 11, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre, Kenneth Schwartz, Christopher Barlow, Page Griffin, Michael Cardella, Stuart Levi, Taylor Votek, Benjamin Salzer, Lisa G. Liu & Liz Kraus
Lock Them Up, or Take No Prisoners? Merger Policy and Acquiring AI Talent: Human Rights and Other Inconvenient Facts
Dec 11, 2025 by
Simon R. Pritchard