US President Donald Trump’s nominee for Attorney General, William Barr, said on Tuesday, January 15, he favors strong enforcement of US antitrust laws and would examine statistics showing that scrutiny of mergers is at historic lows.
“The purpose of the antitrust laws, obviously, is to protect competition,” Barr said in response to a question from Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah). Barr said that competition is ultimately good for consumers, but he suggested that he needs to look more into the topic.
“At the same time, I’m sort of interested in stepping back and re-assessing, or learning more about how the Antitrust Division has been functioning and what their priorities are. I don’t think big is necessarily bad but I think a lot of people wonder how such huge behemoths that now exist in Silicon Valley have taken shape under the nose of the antitrust enforcers… I want to find out more about that dynamic.” Barr stated.
Barr expressed his concerns amid increased scrutiny in Washington over the growth of tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Amazon. The Federal Trade Commission has been examining the effectiveness of antitrust laws in a series of hearings, but it is unclear if that will ultimately lead to any changes in legislation.
Barr also said that he would “absolutely” recuse himself from the Justice Department’s (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit against the AT&T-Time Warner merger. A three-judge panel is considering the the DOJ’s appeal.
Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota) asked Barr about his prior criticism of the DOJ’s decision to try to block the transaction. When he was a board member of Time Warner, Barr wrote an affidavit in support of AT&T-Time Warner’s contention that resistance to the merger was politically motivated. He wrote in the affidavit that cited Trump’s “prior public animus toward this merger” as a reason many would view the lawsuit as political motivated.
But at the confirmation hearing, Barr toned down his criticism. He said that his affidavit “speaks for itself,” and that he was expressing concern that the DOJ’s Antitrust Division “wasn’t engaging in some of our arguments…I am not sure why they acted the way they did.”
Full Content: Variety
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Age-Restriction Laws Are Proliferating; So Too Are the Difficult Tradeoffs Policymakers Face
Dec 23, 2025 by
CPI
Federal AI Strategy Raises Compliance Stakes for Banks and Big Tech
Dec 23, 2025 by
CPI
Google Sues Alleged China-Based Hackers Over Widespread Phishing Scheme
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Europe Moves to Clarify What Counts as Personal Data
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Larry Ellison Offers $40 Billion Guarantee as Paramount Renews Bid for Warner Bros
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi