A PYMNTS Company

US: DOJ brings first ‘No-Poach’ prosecution

 |  April 12, 2018

Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced the first of a number of anticipated no-poach enforcement actions, reported JDSupra.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The DOJ’s Antitrust Division announced its first challenge to a “no-poaching” agreement, where companies agree not to recruit or hire each other’s employees, under the Trump Administration. The settlement that the Antitrust Division reached with the offending companies is noteworthy because the Division opted to treat the companies’ no-poaching agreement as a civil antitrust violation even though the Division’s guidelines for human resource professionals, which were issued toward the end of the Obama Administration, and recent remarks by its senior leadership team indicated that such agreements would be treated as criminal violations.

    A careful review of this settlement and the Antitrust Division’s accompanying press release indicates that there is a significant likelihood that no-poaching and wage-fixing agreements that were entered into or that continued after the Antitrust Division issued its guidelines for human resource professionals will be prosecuted as criminal violations, JDSupra reported. Moreover, in announcing this settlement, the Antitrust Division made clear that vigorous enforcement in the employment area will continue to be one of its top priorities.

    As noted, Mr. Delrahim stated that there were a number of these investigations ongoing, and in the News Release said that this Complaint was “part of a broader investigation by the Antitrust Division into naked agreements not to compete for employees.”

    Full Content: JD Supra

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.