A PYMNTS Company

The Interface of EU and National Tort Law: Competition Law

 |  December 7, 2016

Posted by Social Science Research Network

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The Interface of EU and National Tort Law: Competition Law

    Okeoghene Odudu (University of Cambridge) & Albert Sanchez-Graells (University of Bristol Law School)

    Abstract:     This chapter aims to assess the framework enabling private parties to enforce competition law and the implications this has both in relation to the evolution of national tort law in EU Member States, and for an incipient acquis of EU tort law. It considers how the law has evolved since the CJEU in Courage v Crehan confirmed that those able to show that they have suffered loss as a result of a competition law violation are able to recover compensatory damages, and the progress made since the adoption of Directive 2014/104/EU on antitrust damages. The chapter focuses on four selected topics: the erosion of the requirement of fault; the erosion of individual responsibility; the extension of recoverable losses; and modifications to the burden of proof arising from a presumption of damage resulting from certain types of anticompetitive behaviour. It concludes by questioning whether traditional tort law doctrines at Member State level can survive under the pressure of these EU law developments. The chapter indicates areas of uncertainty that may serve to guide future research efforts.

    Continue reading…