A PYMNTS Company

Abuse of Market Power: The End of ‘Make-Believe’ Analysis?

 |  July 20, 2016

Posted by Social Science Research Network

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Abuse of Market Power: The End of ‘Make-Believe’ Analysis?

    Donal Curtin (Economics New Zealand)
    Abstract:      This paper argues that the New Zealand legislation against abuse of market power, and subsequent jurisprudence, is ineffective to deal with the problem, in particular by relying on a counterfactual test – would a firm without market power have done the same thing, and if so, the firm with market power cannot be said to have “used” its market power (the language of the legislation). This subverts the over-riding issue, that some actions when undertaken by firms with market power have anti-competitive effects. The paper recommends that New Zealand follow Australia’s proposed solution, to move to an “effects” test, with an efficiency defence.