A PYMNTS Company

US: Appeals court backs fishermen in antitrust suit

 |  May 5, 2016

A federal court order blocking Pacific Seafood Group from purchasing Ocean Gold Seafoods will remain until a trial into whether the sale would create a monopoly.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Commercial fishermen won a preliminary injunction against the sale last year in U.S. District Court in Medford. A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s order Tuesday.

    The fishermen allege that Pacific Seafood’s acquisition of Ocean Gold, a large fish processor in Westport, Washington, would establish a monopoly in the groundfish, whiting and coldwater shrimp markets.

    Pacific Seafood, a Clackamas-based company that is a dominant player in fish processing and distribution, announced after a legal setback last year that the deal for Ocean Gold was canceled.

    But the company, led by Frank Dulcich, wanted the court to compel arbitration as part of a previous antitrust suit by fishermen that was settled. The district court declined, a decision also upheld by the appeals court.

    Judge A. Wallace Tashima found that the fishermen — including Dennis Rankin of Astoria — showed a sufficient likelihood of success in their legal challenge and demonstrated the potential for irreparable harm from the sale.

    The Oregon Attorney General’s Office has called the potential merger of Pacific Seafood and Ocean Gold “presumptively unlawful given the degree of market concentration.”

    “The decision this week was about where the dispute would be heard,” said Daniel Occhipinti, Pacific Seafood’s general counsel and director of government affairs. “We’re disappointed with the ruling but we continue to maintain that the plaintiffs’ claims are meritless, and we will prove that in whatever forum we have to.”

    Full Content: The Daily Astorian

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.