On the last day of the ebooks price-fixing trial, Apple and the US Department of Justice issued their closing statements. In one of the largest antitrust cases in recent history, Apple declared that it “did not conspire with a single publisher to fix prices” when it entered the ebooks industry with the launch of its new iPad in 2010. The DOJ’s closing remarks had a very different tone, however, insisting that Apple deliberately capped e-books prices in the tech giant’s policy to require an agency model of pricing from publishers, as opposed to the wholesale pricing model. The case, being tried in US District Court in Manhattan, has been highly publicized. Most recently, reports paint a shaky picture for the DOJ as testimony largely discredited the regulator’s arguments that Apple deliberately required ebooks publishers to use the agency pricing model in order to compete with Amazon.
Featured News
Age-Restriction Laws Are Proliferating; So Too Are the Difficult Tradeoffs Policymakers Face
Dec 23, 2025 by
CPI
Federal AI Strategy Raises Compliance Stakes for Banks and Big Tech
Dec 23, 2025 by
CPI
Google Sues Alleged China-Based Hackers Over Widespread Phishing Scheme
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Europe Moves to Clarify What Counts as Personal Data
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Larry Ellison Offers $40 Billion Guarantee as Paramount Renews Bid for Warner Bros
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi