A recently-filed federal lawsuit in the state of New Jersey has reportedly re-opened the debate as to the relationship between antitrust law and professional certification boards. The suit, filed April 23, concerns the practice of requiring healthcare specialists to participate in a training and testing program, or else risk being barred from practicing in the market. The suit accuses the American Board of Medical Specialties, which oversees 24 medical boards, of violating antitrust law by hampering competition through the exclusion of those healthcare specialists. The case was initiated by physicians opposed to the requirement. The case may have strong implications for various other markets, as similar requirements are held within professions like accounting and law. According to one expert, while these cases are not uncommon, they are rarely successful for the professionals who initiate the contest.
Featured News
New York Puts Businesses on Notice for Algorithmic Pricing
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer Expands US Antitrust Team with New Partner Hire
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Antitrust Authority Fines Oxygen Suppliers Over Exclusive Contracts
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
EU Cloud Group Pushes for Halt to Broadcom VMware Changes
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Sen. Blackburn Releases Discussion Draft of Bill to Set Federal ‘Framework’ for AI Policy
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak