In a costly mistake for the firmer competition authority of Ottawa, Canada’s Competition Tribunal ended a high-profile case by ruling against the watchdog and in favor of the Toronto Real Estate Board. According to reports, it was a filing technicality that determined the case’s result, as a suit filed by the commission against the real estate board was filed under the wrong section of the Competition Act. Interim Commissioner of Competition John Pecman said his office is “disappointed” by the decision, which was made public by the tribunal this week. According to the ruling, the allegations of anticompetitive practices were filed under the 2012 Abuse of Dominance Guidelines; the tribunal noted that the proper filing would have fallen under Section 90 of the Act, which concerns behavior by trade associations. Pecman announced that his office will review their next options.
Featured News
Federal Judges Press Administration Over Attempted CFPB Workforce Cuts
Feb 25, 2026 by
CPI
Interoperability Becomes Finance’s Next Regulatory Flashpoint
Feb 25, 2026 by
CPI
US Steps Up Diplomatic Pressure on Countries That Limit Cross-Border Data Flows
Feb 25, 2026 by
CPI
Musk Moves to Exclude Law Firm’s OpenAI Probe From Jury in April Trial
Feb 25, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Judge Unlikely to Halt Landmark Antitrust Trial Over Concert Ticketing
Feb 25, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece