Lawyers are looking to have a case filed in 2008 against major bond insurance and credit ratings companies to be dismissed, arguing that the cities – which claim that companies forced various local governments in California to buy unnecessary insurance – do not have enough evidence to sue. Ambac Financial Group and Moody’s Corp. are among the defendants in the antitrust case, filed on behalf of California cities that say the companies colluded to keep credit ratings high, ultimately creating a dual credit rating scheme that “punished” the cities with lower ratings. A lawyer representing Standard & Poors claims the plaintiffs haven’t “come close” to providing enough evidence.
Featured News
Age-Restriction Laws Are Proliferating; So Too Are the Difficult Tradeoffs Policymakers Face
Dec 23, 2025 by
CPI
Federal AI Strategy Raises Compliance Stakes for Banks and Big Tech
Dec 23, 2025 by
CPI
Google Sues Alleged China-Based Hackers Over Widespread Phishing Scheme
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Europe Moves to Clarify What Counts as Personal Data
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Larry Ellison Offers $40 Billion Guarantee as Paramount Renews Bid for Warner Bros
Dec 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi