In the midst of recent suits charging Barclays with LIBOR manipulation, the U.S. is now threatening to fine the bank for about $470 million, alleging Barclays manipulate electricity markets in California. The fine would exceed the money paid by Barclays in the LIBOR scandal. According to the penalty, which would be issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the bank has 30 days to argue against the claims of price-fixing in the electricity sector in a “loss-leader” scheme, where electricity prices were fixed to show a loss so as to make profits in related position in the swaps market. If a suit is filed, the case could set a precedent, determining whether the practice is legal or not. The FERC earned the power to fight price-manipulation in 2005.
Featured News
US Appeals Court Tosses FTC Order Over Intuit’s “Free” TurboTax Ads
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Jury Finds Musk Liable for Misleading Twitter Shareholders During Takeover Fight
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Launches Healthcare Task Force to Sharpen Enforcement
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
White House Pushes Congress for National AI Law to Override State Rules
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Copyright Settlement Lawyers Cut Fee Request to $187.5 Million
Mar 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak