Frank Easterbrook, Apr 01, 2005
In this article, Frank Easterbrook sets out the basic components of what has become known as the error-cost framework in antitrust, an approach that has gained influence in recent years. This framework recognizes the possibility that courts will make mistakes in deciding antitrust cases, and that those mistakes will result in false positives (false convictions) and false negatives (false acquittals). Moreover, the error-cost approach focuses attention on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives.
Featured News
Bill Gates Urges Congress to Put AI Safeguards Into Law
Sep 27, 2026 by
CPI
Automattic, WordPress CEO Must Face Antitrust Claims in Trademark Dispute
Sep 27, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Faces Class Action Over Apple Pay Fees Charged to Banks
Sep 27, 2026 by
CPI
Linklaters Calls for Tougher UK Test on Antitrust Class Actions
Sep 27, 2026 by
CPI
France Raids Landscaping Firms in Competition Probe
Sep 27, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton