Frank Easterbrook, Apr 01, 2005
In this article, Frank Easterbrook sets out the basic components of what has become known as the error-cost framework in antitrust, an approach that has gained influence in recent years. This framework recognizes the possibility that courts will make mistakes in deciding antitrust cases, and that those mistakes will result in false positives (false convictions) and false negatives (false acquittals). Moreover, the error-cost approach focuses attention on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives.
Featured News
Michael Burry Accuses Nvidia of Blocking AMD From Key AI Deal
Mar 10, 2026 by
CPI
Meta to Charge Advertisers Fee in EU Markets With Digital Taxes
Mar 10, 2026 by
CPI
German Advertising and Media Groups Urge Antitrust Action Against Apple
Mar 10, 2026 by
CPI
Dutch Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Requiring Chronological Feeds on Facebook and Instagram
Mar 10, 2026 by
CPI
Sony Fights £2 Billion London Lawsuit Over PlayStation Store Prices
Mar 10, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece