Douglas Ginsburg, Apr 01, 2006
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, the cornerstone of the U.S. antitrust regime, broadly prohibits contacts, combinations, and conspiracies in restraint of trade and makes it unlawful to monopolize any line of commerce. The open-textured nature of the Act”not unlike a general principle of common law”vests the judiciary with considerable responsibility for interpretation, the discharge of which requires it to choose among competing values. In this important article, then-Professor Robert H. Bork examined the legislative history of the Sherman Act in search of the U.S. Congress’s intent in passing it and, therefore, the policies the judiciary should follow when deciding cases under the Act.
Featured News
Live Nation Pushes Back on States’ Renewed Bid for DOJ Settlement Records
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
California Subpoenas OpenAI as Scrutiny of AI Cybersecurity Risks Grows
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Thomson Reuters Faces Antitrust Suit Over $650 Million Casetext Acquisition
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Sandoz Agrees to $400 Million Deal to Resolve States’ Generic-Drug Antitrust Case
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon e-Book Buyers Move Closer to Class Certification in Antitrust Case
Oct 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton