A PYMNTS Company

Apple Officially Responds to DOJ’s Antitrust Lawsuit, Defends iPhone Ecosystem Design Choices

By  |  July 30, 2025

More than a year after the U.S. Department of Justice filed a sweeping antitrust lawsuit against Apple, the tech giant has formally issued a comprehensive rebuttal. According to The Information, Apple’s long-awaited response arrives 16 months into the legal battle, after multiple unsuccessful attempts to have the case dismissed.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In its filing, Apple claims the government’s lawsuit poses a fundamental threat to innovation, competition, and consumer freedom. “This lawsuit threatens the very principles that set iPhone apart in a fiercely competitive market,” Apple states in its legal response. Per the information included in the filing, the company argues that the DOJ’s theories would reduce consumer choice and “set a dangerous precedent,” potentially giving the government unchecked influence over product design in the tech industry.

    The lawsuit, brought by the DOJ and supported by over a dozen U.S. states, alleges that Apple has maintained a monopoly through restrictive practices in its App Store policies, hardware ecosystem, and digital services. The suit zeroes in on five core design decisions by Apple, which it frames as anti-competitive.

    According to The Information, these include Apple’s prior resistance to supporting “super apps,” its historical limitations on cloud gaming services, its treatment of third-party messaging platforms, its restrictions on smartwatch compatibility, and its exclusive control over wallet app functionality on iPhones. In each instance, Apple either ceased the practice following the lawsuit or continues to justify its position on the grounds of security and user experience.

    For example, while Apple no longer blocks cloud streaming apps outright, it still imposes what developers describe as “arbitrarily high fees,” limiting their ability to compete on a level playing field. Regarding third-party smartwatches and messaging platforms, Apple acknowledges limitations but emphasizes the availability of alternative apps and partial access to iPhone features.

    Related: Spain Turns Up the Heat on Apple in Escalating Antitrust Case

    Apple contends that these design decisions are not monopolistic, but rather intentional product choices aimed at enhancing privacy and security. “This lawsuit seeks to attack a random collection of Apple’s design choices, degrade the privacy and security benefits of iPhone that customers value, and eliminate the competitive differentiation and consumer choice that currently exist in the marketplace,” the company said in its filing.

    The DOJ, however, sees these decisions as part of a larger “monopoly playbook,” alleging that Apple has used its dominant market position to stifle competition and make it difficult for users to switch away from its platform. According to The Information, Apple responded to each of the 236 paragraphs in the DOJ’s complaint, directly denying the allegations and asserting that the “DOJ is wrong.”

    Apple also claimed that the underlying push for the lawsuit is being driven by a small group of powerful third-party developers who benefit from Apple’s innovations while objecting to the terms of using its ecosystem. The company warns that if the DOJ prevails, it could force Apple to alter fundamental aspects of its hardware and software integration—something Apple believes would ultimately harm consumers.

    Source: The Information