A PYMNTS Company

A Joint International AI Lab: Design Considerations

 |  October 17, 2025

By: Duncan Cass-Beggs, Matthew da Mota & Abhiram Reddy (Center for International Governance Innovation)

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In this CIGI article, authors Duncan Cass-Beggs, Matthew da Mota & Abhiram Reddy (Center for International Governance Innovation) discuss the concept of establishing a joint international AI laboratory as a response to growing concerns about the risks posed by highly advanced artificial intelligence systems. The authors explore this proposal in the context of nations potentially embracing ambitious forms of international coordination to address AI safety and security challenges. Their paper examines the design framework for such a facility, beginning with an analysis of the rationale behind why countries might choose to collaborate through an international laboratory setting. They also draw comparisons between this collaborative approach and an alternative vision of a domestically-focused “AGI Manhattan Project,” weighing the advantages and disadvantages of both models.

    The authors proceed to outline the core functions and primary goals that would define the joint laboratory’s mission. They then delve into the governance structure necessary to oversee such an institution, looking to existing high-containment facilities—specifically Biosafety Level 4 laboratories—as instructive precedents for operational protocols and decision-making frameworks. The paper addresses critical security considerations, including methods for protecting proprietary research parameters and preventing unauthorized access or leakage of sensitive information. Additionally, the authors examine contingency measures the laboratory would need to implement for identifying and responding to potential global security threats that might emerge from advanced AI development.

    The article concludes by acknowledging the inherent limitations of this proposal and identifying areas requiring further investigation and research development.

    CONTINUE READING…