Structural remedies are often considered to be the “gold standard” of successful antitrust prosecutions of monopolization and proposed-merger cases: The competitive conditions of the relevant market are recreated without the need for ongoing, detailed monitoring of the defendant’s behavior – which is required for behavioral remedies and which for those remedies becomes an ongoing monitoring/regulatory burden on the plaintiffs (especially government prosecutors) and on the courts. But st
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 216.73.217.30
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!