Accounting for Two-Sided Business Reality Reduces False Negatives as Well as False Positives in Antitrust Decisions Involving Platform Enterprises
By David S. Evans (Global Economics Group) & Richard Schmalensee (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
The two-sided analysis of platform businesses isn’t pro-defendant or pro-plaintiff. By accounting for business reality and modern economics, it helps courts and enforcement agencies reach the right decision and thereby reduce the likelihood of false negatives as well as false positives. Sometimes two-sided analysis is essential for uncovering how conduct harms competition and consumers. Other times it helps establish that conduct is innocuous or beneficial. Fears, and hopes, that two-sided analysis will discourage enforcement efforts are misplaced.
Featured News
French Competition Watchdog Raids EPC Groupe
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
Nippon Steel Vice Chairman to Visit US for Key Meetings in U.S. Steel Acquisition
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
Google Pays Damages to US Government in Attempt to Avoid Jury Trial in Antitrust Case
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
Nature’s Miracle and Agrify Terminate Merger Agreement Amid Challenges
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s AI Safety Institute to Open US Office Amid Growing Calls for Global Collaboration
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI