Legal experts and various companies have warned that uncertainty of regulatory processes as well as high filing fees may threaten merger and acquisition cross-boarder transactions throughout eastern and southern Africa, say reports. Lawyers working with the cross-boarder competition regulator Comesa say the watchdog is charging merger filing fees comparable to those seen in the US, much higher than in South Africa. Comesa, or the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa, is also lacking a threshold limit when determining filing fees, which are calculated as .5 percent of the merging parties’ turnover or their combined asset values. One lawyer, Daryl Dingley, a partner at Webber Wentzel, said that while the watchdog is moving in a positive direction, Comesa will need to clarify the merger filing process and strengthen its kills. Further, there can be confusion when determining whether to file with a national competition regulator or with the regional Comesa.
Featured News
Perkins Coie Adds Former DOJ Antitrust Leader as Partner in Washington
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Ryanair Boss Dismisses Musk’s Buyout as Starlink Feud Escalates
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Extends Warner Bros Bid as Netflix Rivalry Heats Up
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Breaks New Ground With Landmark AI Law
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
NYDFS Warns Banks They Can’t Outsource Vendor Risk
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Recidivism
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Recidivism, Multiple Offending, and Serial Offending in Antitrust
Jan 21, 2026 by
Gregory Werden
Antitrust Recidivism: Why Repeat Cases Appear, and Why True Reoffending Is Rare in the United States
Jan 21, 2026 by
Lisa M. Phelan, Megan S. Golden, Adrienne Irmer & Nina Worth
99 Antitrust Problems – Is Recidivism One?
Jan 21, 2026 by
Brian A. Ratner & Kartik S. Madiraju
Holding A Cat by the Tail: A View of Cartel Recidivism in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 21, 2026 by
Mark Rosman & KaDee L. Ru