E-commerce giant Amazon has been hit with a hefty fine of 31 million zlotys ($7.8 million) by Poland’s consumer protection watchdog, UOKiK, for deceptive practices related to product availability and delivery commitments. The regulatory body disclosed on Wednesday that it had received several complaints from dissatisfied customers who did not receive their orders as promised.
“The average consumer has the right to assume that the purchase options, availability, and delivery times offered by traders are not misleading,” stated Tomasz Chrostny, the head of UOKiK, emphasizing the importance of transparency and reliability in online transactions.
One of the key issues highlighted by the regulator was the practice of displaying time counters on the Amazon website, suggesting a specific window for placing orders without a guaranteed delivery within the indicated timeframe. This tactic, according to UOKiK, misled customers into believing that their orders would arrive within the specified period, which often turned out to be inaccurate.
Read more: EU Court Upholds Tech Rules: Amazon Loses Battle Over Advertising Clause
Responding to the penalty, Amazon’s press office announced its intention to appeal the decision, as reported by Reuters. The company emphasized its commitment to customer satisfaction, noting that while the majority of deliveries are made on time, it acknowledges occasional delays or order cancellations and pledges to address such issues promptly.
“Over the last year, we have collaborated with UOKiK and proposed multiple voluntary amendments to continue to improve the customer experience on Amazon.pl. We strictly follow legal standards in all countries where we operate and we strongly disagree with the assessment and penalty issued by the UOKiK,” Amazon stated in an emailed response.
The fine imposed by UOKiK underscores the growing scrutiny faced by tech giants like Amazon over their business practices, particularly concerning consumer protection and fair competition. As the appeal process unfolds, all eyes will be on how Amazon navigates this regulatory challenge and its implications for online retail operations in Poland.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI