In a recent courtroom clash, Amazon emerged victorious in the initial skirmish against European Union regulators, who had singled out the tech giant as one of the companies subjected to heightened scrutiny under the EU’s stringent new content moderation regulations.
The turning point came with an order issued late on Wednesday by the president of the EU’s General Court, which partially suspended the European Commission’s decision from April, reported Bloomberg. This decision had mandated Amazon to divulge a comprehensive database detailing the advertisements it receives, encompassing information regarding their content, the brand name or subject, and the identities of those responsible for payment.
Amazon’s legal maneuvering began in July when it challenged the EU’s classification of the company as a “very large online platform” (VLOP) under the Digital Services Act, a classification it shares with market rivals like Google Shopping and Alibaba. Shortly thereafter, the Luxembourg-based court issued a temporary order that fully suspended the EU’s initial designation. The recent court order effectively supersedes this earlier ruling.
Read more: Amazon Challenges EU’s ‘Large Online Platform’ Law
In response to the court’s decision, Amazon issued an emailed statement expressing its approval, stating, “We welcome this decision as an important first step that supports our broader position that Amazon doesn’t fit the description of a ‘Very Large Online Platform’ (VLOP) under the DSA, and therefore should not be designated as such. We look forward to working closely with the EC with regard to Amazon’s other obligations under the DSA.”
The EU introduced the groundbreaking Digital Services Act last year, driven by concerns over the perceived failure of powerful tech companies to combat illicit content on their platforms. These new regulations mandate that online marketplaces, including Amazon, must identify and trace sellers on their platforms, implement mechanisms for users to report illegal content, and conduct random checks to detect illegal products.
Source: BNN Bloomberg
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI