Douglas Ginsburg, Apr 01, 2006
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, the cornerstone of the U.S. antitrust regime, broadly prohibits contacts, combinations, and conspiracies in restraint of trade and makes it unlawful to monopolize any line of commerce. The open-textured nature of the Act”not unlike a general principle of common law”vests the judiciary with considerable responsibility for interpretation, the discharge of which requires it to choose among competing values. In this important article, then-Professor Robert H. Bork examined the legislative history of the Sherman Act in search of the U.S. Congress’s intent in passing it and, therefore, the policies the judiciary should follow when deciding cases under the Act.
Featured News
Croatia Competition Authority Approves HPB Acquisition of Croatia Banka
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
Democratic Lawmakers Urge DOJ to Closely Examine Fox-Roku Merger
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
US Judge Clears Path for Broad Beef Antitrust Class Actions Against Major Meatpackers
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
India’s Competition Regulator Dismisses Antitrust Complaint Against Reliance Jio and 4,500 Firms
Jul 19, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Opens Early Settlement Discussions With DOJ
Jul 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Agentic AI & Antitrust
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
AI Agents and Collusion: The Two Faces of Agentic AI
Jul 16, 2026 by
Giovanna Massarotto
Agentic AI’s Regulatory Conundrum
Jul 16, 2026 by
Anant Raut
Inter-AI-Agent Competition
Jul 16, 2026 by
Stefan Thomas
Navigating the Increasing Regulatory Scrutiny of AI-Pricing Tools: Competition and Other Emerging Risks
Jul 16, 2026 by
Mark Krotoski & Vinny Sidhu