Jack Ma’s Ant Group is in talks with regulators in China to revive its crowdfunded medical coverage unit, Xiang Hu Bao, and develop it into a regulated company, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, May 6, citing sources.
Xiang Hu Bao — which means “mutual treasure” or “mutual protection” — has 91 million members that rely on its mutual-aid service. Forcing the unit to shutter could be detrimental to the people who need the service or who have funded payouts for other members, sources told WSJ.
The crowdfunded medical coverage has no signup fees, and members can get as much as US$45,000 for life-threatening illnesses or injuries. Members have had to contribute less than one cent toward each claim, per the report.
It is anticipated that Xiang Hu Bao will be transformed into a commercial product regulated by the banking and insurance arms in China, according to sources. Further, Ant Group is collaborating with a licensed insurance firm to facilitate Xiang Hu Bao’s conversion to a regulated medical insurance plan. Talks between the government and Ant are ongoing and no direction has yet been decided, sources said.
Introduced in 2018 as an insurance product, Xiang Hu Bao is not yet profitable, and has seen members drop off from its high of 106 million. Memberships started declining after Ant Group’s initial public offering (IPO) was halted by regulators in November 2020.
Regulators in China are investigating government officials about how Ant Group was able to get fast approval for a dual listing in Shanghai and Hong Kong. Beijing is also probing which companies would have benefited the most from Ant’s IPO.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Federal Judge Orders Google to Open Android App Store Amid Antitrust Pressure
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Greenlights FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Some State Claims
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh